Technology Comparison: Faraday versus Preventor

FARADAY CAGE

CONVENTIONAL SYSTEM

PREVENTOR SYSTEM 2005

EARLY STREAMER EMISSION SYSTEM

» Requires a myriad of cable networks on roof.

» Protects only the structure to which it is affixed.

» More costly.

» Requires numerous downleads to ground.

» Requires a multitude of penetrations thru-roof.

» A static device, reportedly will not aid as anti-interference device.

» Tendency toward disturbing aesthetic qualities of architectural design.

» Multitude of sharp pointed air terminals on roof can prove to be dangerous to maintenance personnel or others with roof access.

» When installed in accordance with Manufacturer's Standard and instructions, provides guarantee and ten million dollar insurance coverage for product performance

» Less costly; a better value.

» Generally requires no more than two downleads to ground.

» Three primary components, less cable is required.

» Generally requires no more than two penetrations in roof.

» Ten million dollar product insurance included in base price.

» Low maintenance and easy modifications in event of building additions.

» Acts as anti-interference device for most communication systems.

» Aesthetically a better choice.

» Unit is safer for maintenance personnel and others with roof access. Fully supported by twenty-five years of successful performance by literally thousands of ESE systems installed.